FDX: Transforming Onboarding with AI on Amazon Bedrock!

Disclaimer: The following report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. All investors should conduct their own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Executive Summary

FedEx Corporation (FDX) is undergoing a historic operational and technological restructuring, pivoting from volume-driven growth to margin discipline and structural efficiency. This report evaluates the fundamental pillars of the current investment thesis: Dividend Policy & Yield: FedEx offers a highly sustainable forward dividend yield of 1.54% to 1.65%, backed by an annualized payout of $4.88 per share. The payout ratio remains incredibly conservative at ~29% to 31%, heavily supported by an expanded $5.1 billion in adjusted free cash flow generated in FY2026. Leverage & Maturities: The company's balance sheet is solid, highlighted by a $3.3 billion dual-currency debt restructuring executed in September 2026. This staggered its maturities (spanning to 2036) and naturally hedged its European exposure. Its covenanted leverage ratio sits comfortably between 1.9x and 2.7x. Interest Coverage: Unadjusted LTM interest coverage remains robust between 12.3x and 14.8x. While adjusted interest coverage tightened to 6.6x due to macroeconomic borrowing costs, the firm maintains ample top-line solvency to service its debt. Valuation & Comps: FDX trades at a trailing P/E of ~17.4x and a discounted Price-to-Sales (P/S) multiple of 0.7x. In contrast, its primary peer, UPS, trades at a cheaper forward P/E of 12.43x but commands a higher P/S of 0.9x. The market is currently pricing a growth premium into FDX based on the projected success of its cost-reduction initiatives. * Top Risks: The aggressive entrance of Amazon Supply Chain Services (ASCS) into the third-party logistics market poses a direct threat to package yields. Additionally, internal execution risks surrounding the “Network 2.0” consolidation—which involves closing roughly 30% of its facilities—and macroeconomic fuel volatility remain the primary headwinds.

***

The logistics sector stands at a critical inflection point, and FedEx Corporation (FDX) is undergoing what appears to be the most comprehensive structural reorganization in its half-century history. The following key points frame the current investment thesis: Technological overhaul appears to be driving operational efficiency: FDX is aggressively integrating generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into its enterprise workflows, leveraging the ServiceNow platform powered by Amazon Bedrock to automate millions of internal processes, including massive-scale employee onboarding. Structural consolidation is actively unlocking margins: The ambitious “Network 2.0” and “DRIVE” initiatives are systematically dismantling the legacy siloed structure of Express and Ground operations, a move that research suggests will strip billions in redundant operating expenses. Capital structure and strategic focus have been radically redefined: The June 2026 spin-off of the less-than-truckload (LTL) division, FedEx Freight (FDXF), has transitioned FDX into a pure-play parcel and express delivery entity, fundamentally altering its valuation framework and capital allocation strategy. Competitive threats are intensifying: While the company's internal metrics reflect disciplined margin expansion, the entrance of Amazon Supply Chain Services (ASCS) into the third-party logistics market poses a formidable, long-term existential risk to B2B parcel yields.

The narrative surrounding FedEx has historically been one of cyclical exposure, deeply tethered to global macroeconomic health and e-commerce volumes. However, under the current executive leadership, the narrative has shifted toward internal self-help, digital transformation, and margin-over-volume discipline. This exhaustive report synthesizes the technological, operational, financial, and competitive dimensions of FedEx to evaluate its viability and valuation in a rapidly evolving industrial landscape.

Technological Leap: AI, Amazon Bedrock, and ServiceNow Integration

At the heart of any global logistics network is human capital. Operating a fleet of 700 aircraft, including the Boeing 767-300F and Cessna 408 SkyCourier, and over 175,000 motorized ground vehicles requires an immense, highly fluid workforce (FedEx FY26 SEC Form 10-K) [cite: 1, 2, 3]. The historical friction associated with human resources (HR), information technology (IT) support, and employee onboarding has traditionally represented a massive, unseen operating expense. FedEx is actively confronting this inefficiency through advanced enterprise software integrations.

The ServiceNow and Amazon Bedrock Ecosystem

FedEx currently executes approximately 5 million ServiceNow workflows per month, utilizing the platform to orchestrate everything from internal IT asset management to complex HR service delivery [cite: 4, 5]. The critical evolution in this architecture is the integration of Amazon Bedrock, a fully managed service from Amazon Web Services (AWS) that provides access to leading foundational Large Language Models (LLMs), such as Anthropic, AI21 Labs, and Amazon's own proprietary models [cite: 4, 5].

Think of ServiceNow as the central nervous system that routes data, and Amazon Bedrock as the brain that reads that data in real-time to decide what needs to happen next. Through the Now Assist GenAI experience, developers at FedEx can build and deploy custom GenAI skills tailored to specific business requirements [cite: 4]. This ecosystem operates through a seamless data exchange: ServiceNow workflows pass contextual, real-time operational data to the Bedrock LLMs. The models then generate dynamic outputs—ranging from automated incident summaries and actionable IT insights to personalized onboarding protocols—which are executed directly within the ServiceNow interface [cite: 4].

Transforming the Onboarding Pipeline

In a high-turnover industry characterized by massive seasonal hiring spikes—for example, targeting roughly 66,000 to 70,000 seasonal workers across its Ground and Express networks during peak seasons—traditional employee onboarding involves fragmented communication across HR, legal, and IT departments (Bloomberg Staffing Industry News) [cite: 6, 7]. The Amazon Bedrock integration allows FedEx to automate the provisioning of digital credentials, the assignment of training modules, and the allocation of physical IT assets.

For example, when a new logistics manager is hired, the GenAI system can instantly cross-reference their role, geographic location, and security clearance requirements. It subsequently triggers automated workflows to secure the necessary hardware, generate specific regulatory compliance modules, and provide a conversational IT support agent for their first-day setup. This reduces the time-to-productivity for new hires from weeks to days, directly compressing the administrative overhead required to staff global fulfillment centers [cite: 8, 9].

Furthermore, IT Asset Management (ITAM) is heavily optimized. Returns of equipment (Return Merchandise Authorizations, or RMAs) are tracked via custom tables within ServiceNow, ensuring that data-bearing assets from offboarded employees are recovered swiftly, thereby maintaining rigorous risk and regulatory compliance standards [cite: 8]. The synergy of AWS's underlying processing power and ServiceNow's workflow orchestration turns a traditional cost center into a scalable, intelligent engine.

The Genesis of Network 2.0 and the “One FedEx” Era

To fully contextualize the financial and valuation metrics of the modern FedEx, one must understand the operational paradigm shift known as Network 2.0. For decades, FedEx operated its business units—specifically FedEx Express (time-definite air) and FedEx Ground (deferred surface delivery)—as completely independent networks.

Dismantling Operational Silos

Historically, this segmented approach resulted in severe asset redundancy. It was common for a FedEx Express truck and a FedEx Ground truck to traverse the exact same neighborhood, and sometimes deliver to the exact same address, on the same day [cite: 10, 11]. Network 2.0, an integral pillar of the broader “DRIVE” cost-reduction program, which is targeting $4 billion in permanent structural cost savings by FY2025 and an incremental $2 billion by FY2027, fundamentally reconstructs this model (FedEx FY23 Chairman's Letter) [cite: 10, 12, 13, 14].

The integration initiative merges Express and Ground into a unified “One FedEx” pickup and delivery (PUD) network. By streamlining operations, FedEx aims to dramatically reduce “miles driven” and consolidate its physical footprint [cite: 10, 12].

The transition is aggressive. Management anticipates closing over 475 operational stations—representing roughly 30% of its facility footprint—by the end of 2027 [cite: 11]. While the initial rollout focused on smaller markets, the integration scaled significantly in 2026 to encompass major metropolitan areas like San Francisco. By the 2026 peak shipping season, FedEx expects 65% of its eligible average daily volume in the U.S. and Canada to flow through optimized Network 2.0 facilities [cite: 11].

The Tricolor Air Network Strategy

The surface network consolidation is paired with a redesigned aviation strategy termed the “Tricolor” network, which categorizes air freight into three distinct pipelines to insulate margins from jet fuel volatility: 1. Purple: High-priority, time-definite, high-yield shipments utilizing FedEx-owned aircraft. 2. Orange: Deferred shipments utilizing off-peak flying schedules to maximize asset utilization. 3. White: Low-priority freight offloaded to third-party commercial passenger belly cargo [cite: 15].

By shifting lower-margin volume to the “White” network, FedEx effectively reduces the immense capital expenditure (CapEx) and fuel burdens associated with flying partially empty proprietary aircraft. This operational agility serves as a vital shock absorber against macroeconomic downturns and fuel price spikes [cite: 15, 16].

The Spin-Off of FedEx Freight (FDXF)

Perhaps the most consequential corporate action in recent FedEx history was the spin-off of its highly profitable, less-than-truckload (LTL) division, FedEx Freight. The separation, completed on June 1, 2026, established FedEx Freight as an independent, publicly traded company on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker “FDXF” (FedEx Newsroom Spin-Off Completion) [cite: 17, 18, 19].

Strategic Rationale and Value Unlock

The primary catalyst for the spin-off was valuation arbitrage. Pure-play LTL carriers in North America, such as Old Dominion Freight Line, traditionally trade at significantly higher valuation multiples than integrated, capital-intensive parcel carriers [cite: 15]. As a consolidated entity, FedEx's overall valuation was dragged down by the lower-margin Express business, masking the intrinsic value of the Freight division.

By separating the entities, management created two focused operations. FedEx Freight, possessing comprehensive national LTL network scale and 26,000 service center doors, was freed to pursue aggressive, specialized growth [cite: 18]. Meanwhile, the legacy FedEx corporation could singularly focus on its core B2B/B2C parcel and global air freight turnaround.

Mechanics of the Distribution

The transaction was executed as a tax-free pro rata dividend to existing stockholders. FedEx distributed 80.1% of FedEx Freight's outstanding common stock to its investors, equating to one share of FDXF for every two shares of FDX held as of the May 15, 2026, record date [cite: 17, 18, 19].

Crucially, the parent company retained a 19.9% stake in FedEx Freight. Management explicitly stated this minority stake will be disposed of within 24 months via subsequent exchanges to repay existing FedEx debt, or distributed as further dividends [cite: 17, 19]. This retained equity acts as a highly liquid treasury reserve, providing FedEx with significant flexibility to deleverage its balance sheet without utilizing operating cash flows.

Furthermore, prior to the separation, FedEx Freight issued $3.7 billion in senior unsecured notes [cite: 20, 21]. The net proceeds from this debt issuance were utilized to fund a cash dividend of approximately $4.1 billion to $4.3 billion back to the parent corporation, injecting massive liquidity into FDX's coffers right at the point of separation [cite: 20, 21].

Dividend Policy, History, and Yield

Analyzing the shareholder returns of an industrial transport giant requires adjusting expectations away from traditional real estate or utility metrics.

(Note on Methodology: The user prompt requests an analysis of AFFO/FFO. Adjusted Funds From Operations (AFFO) and Funds From Operations (FFO) are non-GAAP financial measures almost exclusively utilized in the Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) sector to measure cash generated by real estate assets, excluding depreciation. Because FedEx is a logistics carrier characterized by rolling stock and aviation depreciation, traditional Free Cash Flow (FCF) and Operating Cash Flow (OCF) are the standard and most accurate proxies for dividend coverage and operational yield. Therefore, this report will evaluate FDX's payout sustainability using FCF metrics).

Historical Consistency and Current Payouts

FedEx has maintained an unbroken record of paying cash dividends since 2002 [cite: 22, 23]. The company has displayed a robust commitment to dividend growth, boasting a 5-year dividend growth rate of approximately 15.58% and a 10-year growth rate exceeding 17% [cite: 22, 24, 25].

Following the June 2026 Freight spin-off, the dividend policy was fundamentally reset to reflect the new perimeter of the company. FedEx established a new quarterly cash dividend of $1.22 per share, which translates to an annualized payout of $4.88 [cite: 22, 23, 26].

Yield Analysis and Payout Ratios

Based on late-2026 trading prices (hovering around the $320-$330 range), the forward dividend yield sits at approximately 1.54% to 1.65% [cite: 24, 27]. While this yield is relatively modest on an absolute basis, it is highly sustainable. The dividend payout ratio stands at an incredibly conservative 29% to 31% of earnings [cite: 22, 24, 25].

This conservative payout ratio represents a massive competitive advantage when compared directly to peers. For context, in the trailing twelve months leading into 2026, United Parcel Service (UPS) paid a higher absolute yield (surpassing 6.45% to 6.56%), but that dividend consumed between 94% and 121.93% of its adjusted earnings (UPS Dividend Payout Info) [cite: 26, 28, 29, 30, 31]. By paying out almost every dollar of cash it generated, UPS severely limited its ability to reinvest in automation or weather macroeconomic shocks without utilizing debt. Conversely, FedEx's ~30% payout ratio leaves vast swathes of free cash flow available for its Network 2.0 capital expenditures, share repurchases, and targeted deleveraging.

Free Cash Flow Trajectory

The underlying cash generation supporting this dividend is formidable. In fiscal year 2026, FedEx generated $4.68 billion to $5.1 billion in adjusted free cash flow, representing a massive year-over-year improvement from the $3.0 billion generated in fiscal year 2025 (FedEx Q4 FY26 Earnings) [cite: 26, 32, 33, 34]. This cash flow expansion was achieved primarily through reduced capital expenditures as the early phases of the DRIVE initiative yielded results, pushing the FCF margin up to 5.4% [cite: 32]. The $13.3 billion cash balance held at the end of FY2026 (bolstered by the $4.1B pre-spin dividend from the Freight unit) ensures that the $1.22 quarterly shareholder payout is secure well into the future [cite: 26, 32].

Capital Structure: Leverage, Maturities, and Coverage

A logistics network requires immense rolling asset financing. The structural changes in 2026 forced a complete realignment of FedEx's capital structure, highlighted by the execution of a multi-billion dollar debt issuance to optimize currency exposure and stagger maturities.

The September 2026 Debt Restructuring

On September 14, 2026, FedEx successfully closed a multi-tranche debt offering totaling approximately $3.3 billion [cite: 35, 36]. This strategic issuance was split across different currencies and maturities to match the company's global revenue footprint and manage interest rate risk: Euro-Denominated Tranche: FedEx issued €1.1 billion of 4.000% Notes due 2030, alongside €900 million of 4.625% Notes due 2034 [cite: 35, 36]. Issuing Euro debt allows FedEx to create a natural financial hedge against its European operations (which were heavily expanded following the 2016 acquisition of TNT Express). USD-Denominated Tranche: The company issued $1.1 billion of 5.750% Notes due 2036 [cite: 35, 37].

These notes were issued slightly below par (e.g., the USD notes priced at 99.777%) and include standard investor protections, such as a make-whole call option prior to a specified date and a Change of Control Repurchase Event clause that allows holders to put the notes back to FedEx at 101% of principal [cite: 36, 37]. The proceeds from these offerings are slated for general corporate purposes, which heavily implies the redemption and refinancing of older, impending debt maturities [cite: 36, 37].

Leverage Metrics

Following the spin-off, FedEx actively managed its leverage profile. The company's Debt-to-Equity ratio fluctuates between 0.74x and 1.36x depending on the inclusion of specific operational leases and adjustments [cite: 32, 38].

A critical measure of the company's financial health is its covenanted leverage ratio. FedEx's credit agreements require the company to maintain an adjusted Debt-to-EBITDA ratio of no more than 3.5 to 1.0 on a rolling four-quarter basis [cite: 39]. Throughout late 2025 and into 2026, the company operated comfortably below this ceiling, with the debt-to-adjusted EBITDA ratio registering around 1.9x to 2.7x, indicating ample breathing room and a solid investment-grade profile [cite: 38, 39].

Interest Coverage Ratio

The Interest Coverage Ratio (EBIT divided by Interest Expense) determines how easily the enterprise can service its debt obligations from ongoing operating income. For FedEx, this metric presents a nuanced picture depending on the exact trailing parameters utilized: Top-Line Solvency: Unadjusted LTM (Last Twelve Months) interest coverage ratios for FY2026 appear remarkably strong, with various financial aggregates placing the ratio between 12.3x and 14.8x [cite: 40, 41, 42]. At 14.8x, the company sits comfortably above its 10-year historical median of 7.92x, ranking higher than 70% of the transportation sector [cite: 41]. Adjusted Tightening: However, a deeper forensic analysis utilizing adjusted interest coverage (which factors in capitalized interest and recent borrowing cost spikes) shows a tightening trend. In this view, the adjusted ratio declined from 7.97 in 2024 to a period low of 6.62 by May 2026 [cite: 43]. This decline was driven by a sharp spike in total interest costs, which rose to $970 million in 2026 [cite: 43].

Despite the reduction in the adjusted ratio, an interest coverage multiple of 6.6x still indicates robust financial flexibility. The business throws off sufficient operating profit to cover its debt servicing costs more than six times over, minimizing bankruptcy risk and safeguarding the dividend.

Valuation: Trading Multiples and Peer Comparisons

The valuation of FedEx must be viewed through a comparative lens, specifically against its primary duopoly peer, United Parcel Service (UPS). Throughout 2026, the market has priced FedEx with a distinct growth and transformation premium, marking a stark divergence in how investors view the two carriers.

Comparative Multiples Analysis

To distill the duopoly's divergent valuations, consider the structural juxtaposition of the metrics below.

| Valuation & Operational Metric | FedEx (FDX) | United Parcel Service (UPS) | | :— | :— | :— | | Forward P/E Ratio | ~17.4x (Trailing Proxy) | 12.43x | | Price-to-Sales (P/S) | 0.7x | 0.9x | | Forward Dividend Yield | 1.54% – 1.65% | 6.45% – 6.56% | | Dividend Payout Ratio | ~29.0% – 31.0% | 94.0% – 121.93% | | Target Operating Margin | 10.0% (by 2029) | 9.6% (2026 Guidance) |

(Note: UPS comparative data sourced from consensus multiples and management guidance) (UPS Forward PE Ratio) [cite: 30, 44, 45, 46].

Unpacking the Divergence

This dual valuation gap—a higher P/E for FedEx but a lower Price-to-Sales ratio—tells a complex story about margins and growth vectors. 1. The UPS Margin Premium: The market awards UPS a higher revenue multiple because UPS has historically operated with superior margin discipline. Even amidst a recent “contractionary equilibrium” where UPS intentionally shrunk volume (particularly from Amazon) to protect yield, its operating margin assumption remained near 9.6% to 9.8% [cite: 28, 46, 47, 48]. 2. The FDX Growth Premium: Conversely, the higher P/E ratio for FedEx reflects Wall Street's belief in the structural reform of the DRIVE and Network 2.0 programs. With FedEx's operating margins hovering around 5.8% to 6.6%, analysts foresee a massive earnings expansion as FedEx closes the margin gap with UPS [cite: 32, 38]. The spin-off of the Freight business, combined with the aggressive cost-cutting targets and guided revenue growth of 6.0% to 6.5%, provides a clear, actionable thesis for earnings momentum that UPS currently lacks [cite: 47].

If FedEx successfully hits its stated target of a 10% operating margin in its U.S. Domestic segment by 2029 [cite: 16], the stock possesses severe upward re-rating potential. The market is pricing in the trajectory of FedEx's recovery, rather than strictly its current state.

Risks, Red Flags, and the Amazon Threat

While the internal transformation narrative is compelling, FedEx operates in a volatile macroeconomic environment facing intense, highly capitalized disruption. An equity analysis is incomplete without a rigorous evaluation of the existential threats facing the firm.

The Apex Predator: Amazon Supply Chain Services (ASCS)

The most glaring red flag for the broader parcel logistics industry is the encroaching shadow of Amazon. Historically, Amazon was a massive customer for both FedEx and UPS. Over the last decade, Amazon built out its own internal logistics network to handle its proprietary e-commerce volumes. Now, Amazon is weaponizing that infrastructure against the incumbents.

In May 2026, Amazon launched Amazon Supply Chain Services (ASCS) [cite: 49, 50]. This program allows any third-party business—not just sellers on the Amazon marketplace—to utilize Amazon's massive network of warehouses, trailers, aircraft, and last-mile delivery vans [cite: 50, 51]. Major blue-chip enterprise clients, including Procter & Gamble, 3M, and American Eagle Outfitters, immediately signed onto the service [cite: 51, 52].

The threat to FedEx is multifaceted: Pricing Compression: Smaller alternative carriers are vulnerable, but even a giant like FedEx faces severe pricing pressure. Amazon Shipping offers two-to-five-day parcel delivery that directly undercuts industry pricing models [cite: 50]. To combat this, FedEx has pivoted toward higher-margin, complex logistics (like healthcare and B2B), but ceding the low-end volume entirely risks eroding network density [cite: 50]. The AWS Playbook: Analysts note that Amazon is utilizing the exact playbook it used to create Amazon Web Services (AWS)—building internal infrastructure first, then externalizing it to the market to create a monopolistic revenue engine [cite: 51].

FedEx management has publicly downplayed the threat. CEO Raj Subramaniam stated that Amazon and FedEx operate “two different businesses entirely,” emphasizing that major corporations will be highly reluctant to hand their supply chain data and inventory visibility over to a direct retail competitor like Amazon [cite: 52, 53].

To solidify this defense, FedEx has aggressively expanded into complex logistics through platforms like FedEx SenseAware and FedEx Surround, which provide real-time location, temperature, and light-exposure tracking for sensitive freight. Currently, approximately 40% of FedEx’s healthcare customers utilize these specialized visibility tools, making them highly sticky and resistant to Amazon's commoditized pricing (FedEx at Citi's 2026 Global TMT Conference) [cite: 54, 55, 56]. While this defense holds logical weight, the sheer scale of Amazon's $200 billion capital expenditure capacity means the overall threat cannot be dismissed [cite: 51].

Execution Risks of Network 2.0

The second major red flag is internal execution risk. Network 2.0 requires closing over 475 facilities and merging tens of thousands of employees and independent contractors into a unified system [cite: 10, 11]. The logistics of this physical consolidation are staggering. Service Disruptions: Consolidating hubs risks temporary service degradations. If package routing falters during peak seasons due to software migrations or physical bottlenecks, institutional clients will swiftly shift volumes to UPS. Labor Frictions: The closure of stations is accompanied by workforce reductions and shift alterations [cite: 10, 57]. Navigating the regulatory and labor-union landscapes associated with mass facility consolidations (especially in international sectors like Europe) poses significant legal and operational hurdles.

Fuel Volatility and Yield Pressures

Finally, the logistics sector remains a hostage to global energy markets. While FedEx employs dynamic fuel surcharges indexed to the U.S. Gulf Coast spot prices to pass costs to consumers, these surcharges traditionally operate on a multi-week lag [cite: 15, 58]. Rapid, extreme spikes in jet fuel or diesel can temporarily ravage operating margins before the surcharges catch up. Furthermore, the reliance on pushing 5.9% average rate increases to consumers has limits; in a recessionary environment, steep rate hikes will accelerate the defection of clients to lower-cost providers like ASCS [cite: 15].

Open Questions and Future Outlook

As FedEx enters the post-spin era, several critical open questions remain that will define its trajectory over the next 24 to 36 months:

1. Deployment of the FDXF Stake: FedEx retained 19.9% of FedEx Freight [cite: 17]. Will management aggressively liquidate this stake to retire high-yield debt, or will they distribute it to stockholders to artificially inflate near-term returns? The prudent use of this asset for deleveraging will be a primary litmus test for the CFO. 2. The “fdx” Platform Adoption: FedEx recently launched the “fdx” data platform, designed to offer merchants white-label tracking, predictive delivery, and automated returns management [cite: 12]. Can this software offering provide a strong enough value proposition to keep enterprise retailers from migrating to Amazon's logistics network? 3. Tricolor Network Resilience: If global trade friction increases and trans-pacific air freight demand craters, will the ability to offload volume to the “White” (commercial passenger) network be sufficient to protect the bottom line?

Conclusion

FedEx Corporation is executing a textbook corporate turnaround. By divesting non-synergistic assets (FedEx Freight), attacking redundant infrastructure (Network 2.0), and leveraging frontier technology (Amazon Bedrock and ServiceNow), the company is structurally lowering its cost floor. The dividend is safe, the capital structure is actively hedged against geographic volatility, and the valuation reflects legitimate optimism.

However, investors must remain highly vigilant. The logistics landscape is no longer a cozy duopoly. FedEx is in a race against time to maximize its internal efficiencies before Amazon Supply Chain Services scales to the point of unassailable dominance. For the risk-tolerant investor, the “One FedEx” transition offers a compelling entry point into an industrial giant redefining its future; for the conservative allocator, the execution risks and competitive threats warrant a measured, highly scrutinized approach.

Sources: 1. q4cdn.com 2. fedex.com 3. eplaneai.com 4. servicenow.com 5. servicenow.com 6. whatjobs.com 7. staffingindustry.com 8. dzone.com 9. servicenow.com 10. dbbnwa.com 11. supplychaindive.com 12. wedbush.com 13. fedex.com 14. tradingview.com 15. moomoo.com 16. fedex.com 17. fedex.com 18. businesswire.com 19. fedex.com 20. fedex.com 21. spglobal.com 22. gurufocus.com 23. dividendinvestor.com 24. stockevents.app 25. investing.com 26. benzinga.com 27. slickcharts.com 28. note.com 29. portfolioslab.com 30. marketbeat.com 31. zacks.com 32. stocktitan.net 33. tikr.com 34. stocktitan.net 35. gurufocus.com 36. stocktitan.net 37. stocktitan.net 38. tipranks.com 39. sec.gov 40. finbox.com 41. gurufocus.com 42. financecharts.com 43. stock-analysis-on.net 44. gurufocus.com 45. portfolioslab.com 46. ups.com 47. tikr.com 48. ups.com 49. tikr.com 50. globaltrademag.com 51. biggo.com 52. supplychaindive.com 53. yrules.com 54. investing.com 55. marketbeat.com 56. dvunified.com 57. sec.gov 58. edgar-online.com

For informational purposes only; not investment advice.